Published: 2025-08-24T09:24:50Z
Tags:
#writers
#discuss
#ai
#chatgpt
Mediumās AI policy feels like gatekeeping: spellcheck is fine, but real AI use is banned. Hereās why that doesnāt fly.
<h2>
<a href="#updated">
</a>
UPDATED
</h2>
<p>Thank you, <a href="https://dev.to/fatherofcurses">@fatherofcurses</a> for making me stop and actually think through <em>solutions</em>. So I've updated my post on <a href="">Medium</a> and suggested this system that I think we all would be able to live with (<em>your</em> here is <em>Medium's</em>):</p>
<p><a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F6rv2yc0bs2pwe59a6k5p.png"><img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F6rv2yc0bs2pwe59a6k5p.png" alt="short dotted horizontal divider"></a></p>
<p>š Donāt exclude everybody by default. <strong>AI ā ābadā</strong>. It can be misused, sure, but stereotyping an entire group of writers because of a few bad actors isnāt okay.</p>
<p>Hereās what I propose:</p>
<ul>
<li>Create an <strong>AI pre-approval</strong> system.</li>
<li>If a writer wants their AI-assisted work to be eligible for your programs, let them <strong>apply</strong>.</li>
<li>Get your human reviewers involved ā tear the post apart, see if itās worthy.</li>
<li>If it passes, give them a badge š·ļø that automatically shows up on their page.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now, two good things happen:</p>
<ol>
<li>Writers arenāt forced to keep disclaiming āAI-generatedā every post ā the badge already says it.</li>
<li>Once approved, their work is treated like everyone elseās. <strong>No blanket exclusion</strong>, just fair review.</li>
</ol>
<p>Yes, itās a little more work on your end. But itās a whole lot easier to swallow ā and way more fair ā for the rest of us.</p>
<hr>
<h2>
<a href="#the-original">
</a>
THE ORIGINAL
</h2>
<blockquote>
<p>Iāve been meaning to write this since I first saw Medium's post on Friday ā but, you know, life happens. So a little late, but I wanted to share. You tell me ā <em>am I the crazy one here?</em> š«¤</p>
<p>š Also, River has shown up in a few posts already ā the Leonardo reimagining of my blog character. Sheās still missing some key features (training tokens are tapped out until the month resets), but you get the idea. š Expect a couple more tweaks coming soon.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So Friday was my chill day (rare, but they do happen) and I noticed somebody had followed me on Medium. Which is funny, because Iād already canceled my membership ā it just hadnāt expired yet. Five bucks a month isnāt exactly breaking the bank, so I thought, fine, maybe Iāll toss a few posts over there alongside LinkedIn.</p>
<p>That <em>was</em> the plan. Until I landed on Mediumās homepage and saw this headline:</p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/blog/we-want-your-feedback-how-can-writers-use-ai-to-tell-human-stories-eb9dee926f2e">āWe want your feedback: how can writers use AI to tell human stories?ā</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>š¦ Perfect hook, right? Except two scrolls later I was fuming like I was just called in for a rollback on a Friday night. š”</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<h2>
<a href="#the-fine-print">
</a>
The Fine Print š
</h2>
<p>By the time you dig through the post, the documentation, and the linked policies, the message is clear:</p>
<ul>
<li>AI as spellcheck? Totally fine. ā
</li>
<li>ChatGPT outlines and fact-checks? Approved. ā
</li>
<li>Anything more (drafting, editing, all other AI assistance)? ā
<ul>
<li>Youāre officially outside their definition of āwriter.ā</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>And if you <em>do</em> dare use AI, you have to declare it at the very top of your post, within the first two paragraphs, and again on every image. Metadata doesnāt count.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>š¦ <strong>TL;DR:</strong> If you lean on AI for anything beyond grammar, you can write on Medium, but youāll never get boosted, partnered, or featured. You <em>can</em> post, but youāre standing outside in the rain while everyone else gets a table inside. š½ļø</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<h2>
<a href="#why-it-feels-off">
</a>
Why It Feels Off š¤
</h2>
<p>Look, I get it. Nobody wants a feed full of unedited AI sludge. Iām not trying to game the system either. Iām not chasing claps or badges. I write because itās fun, because I need a break from code, and because I have opinions the world clearly needs to hear. š </p>
<p><strong>AI doesnāt erase my voice ā it sharpens it.</strong></p>
<p>So calling everything in between spellcheck and prompt-posting off limits? No appeal, no nuance, just blanket exclusion? <em>Thatās</em> where Iām lost.</p>
<p>Developers talk nonstop about AI. Colleges too. Itās a huge, messy, <strong>important conversation</strong>. And Medium ā the site that prides itself on being the ātop blogging platformā ā takes the most stereotypical, exclusionary stance possible. ChatGPT usually gets painted as the villain here, but really, itās just the stand-in for all the tools that make the work easier.</p>
<p>Honestly, it feels less like quality control and more like gatekeeping. Nuance wouldāve made sense. Even a "don't automate your blog posts" sounds great. <em>This?</em> It's like they skipped gray completely and went straight to Twilight Zone monochrome. </p>
<hr>
<h2>
<a href="#my-reply">
</a>
My Reply āļø
</h2>
<p>You know I couldnāt resist. š¤·āāļø Yes ā I dropped a response directly on Medium's front door, and linked to it right in their own discussion. Thatās the only thing Iāve ever published over there besides the previous post on <a href="https://dev.to/anchildress1/how-i-blog-with-bots-but-you-can-still-blame-me-2861">Blogging with Bots</a> I forwarded as an explanation. </p>
<p>If you want the full-on-rant version of how I pushed back, here it is:</p>
<div class="ltag__link">
<a href="https://medium.com/@anchildress1/humansforai-a-story-of-little-value-6c0d43993f92">
<div class="ltag__link__pic">
<img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fmiro.medium.com%2Fv2%2Fresize%3Afill%3A64%3A64%2F1%2ATZVVqJNsp3A8aaoQjHtrbA.jpeg" alt="Ashley Childress">
</div>
</a>
<a href="https://medium.com/@anchildress1/humansforai-a-story-of-little-value-6c0d43993f92">
<div class="ltag__link__content">
<h2>#HumansForAI: A Story of āLittle Valueā | by Ashley Childress | Aug, 2025 | Medium</h2>
<h3>Ashley Childress ć» <time datetime="2025-08-29T17:11:19.353Z">Aug 29, 2025</time> ć»
<div class="ltag__link__servicename">
<img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fassets.dev.to%2Fassets%2Fmedium-f709f79cf29704f9f4c2a83f950b2964e95007a3e311b77f686915c71574fef2.svg" alt="Medium Logo">
Medium
</div>
</h3>
</div>
</a>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>
<a href="#wrapping-it-up">
</a>
Wrapping It Up š±
</h2>
<p>Iām calmer now, but the question still bugs me. AI doesnāt erase my voice ā it just lets me shape it faster, sharper, and with a little extra spark. So if Medium canāt see that, maybe thatās their loss.</p>
<p>And hey, I donāt want this to be a solo rant echoing into the void either! <strong>I want to know what you think.</strong> Is this really such a crime against writing, or is Medium being willfully old-school about it? </p>
<blockquote>
<p>š¦ Letās hash it out right here ā the corner of the internet where the fun people hang around anyway.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<h2>
<a href="#powered-by-espresso-shots-a-healthy-eyeroll-and-a-touch-of-ai-cleanup">
</a>
š”ļø Powered by espresso shots, a healthy eye-roll, and a touch of AI cleanup āļø
</h2>
<p>All opinions are mine, ChatGPT just helped keep the rant from running off the rails (again).</p>
Read on Dev.to ā